Jump to content

Talk:The Mountain Eagle/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Smarojit (talk · contribs) 15:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC) Will be reviewing it in the next couple of days. --smarojit HD 15:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Excellent work Dr. Blofeld. Especially wonderful is the hilarious production section. Couldn't find much to nitpick on other than two small points:

  • Why are a number of lost films (along with their description) mentioned in the final paragraph of the article? It doesn't have much relevance to the film itself.
I'm a film buff. It being a lost film, I thought it would interest readers (myself included) and link to other articles on very notable missing films.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I see. --smarojit HD 11:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done I think.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Other than this, I don't see why this cannot be a GA! :) --smarojit HD 02:37, 21 August 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the review.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

--smarojit HD 11:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Smaro!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]