Talk:The Monastery (TV series)
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the The Monastery (BBC TV series) page were merged into The Monastery (TV series) on June 23, 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merger proposal
[edit]There appears to be a BBC series with the same name, should it be added here or get a page of its own? http://www.worthabbey.net/bbc/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.50.124.34 (talk • contribs) 12:17, 11 July 2007
- Added here; that was the original - thanks for the link - now done. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:58, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- D'oh - there is already a better article at The Monastery (BBC TV series). As this one is just a stub I propose to merge this into the BBC article and move it to The Monastery (television series). - Fayenatic (talk) 21:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Please dont merge the two. There are distinct differences in the telling of the story. Anthony of the Desert (talk) 16:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, but a merge should not lose anything. The final article should include all valid content from both articles. - Fayenatic (talk) 16:55, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- I personally think that a merger will detract from the individual variations. As long as they are linked in a "See Also" they would allow the reader to view each one in turn. I understand the reasons for a merger but think that an effort to get people that have viewed the non-UK variants would be better suited.Anthony of the Desert (talk) 17:22, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'm still not sure, but coming round to your point of view. The edits I made earlier were to see how I think the articles should look if we do keep them separate. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:00, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- I support the merger- it is a tv series and thus all 3 should be on the same page.--Ericci8996 (talk) 01:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- As there doesn't seem to be any agreement, why not just remove the flag? 62.253.80.41 (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- For the record, I'm happy with the outcome now that it has been merged. I withdraw my suggestion for the longer title as "(TV series)" seems to be standard now. – Fayenatic London 06:57, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- As there doesn't seem to be any agreement, why not just remove the flag? 62.253.80.41 (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- I support the merger- it is a tv series and thus all 3 should be on the same page.--Ericci8996 (talk) 01:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'm still not sure, but coming round to your point of view. The edits I made earlier were to see how I think the articles should look if we do keep them separate. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:00, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- I personally think that a merger will detract from the individual variations. As long as they are linked in a "See Also" they would allow the reader to view each one in turn. I understand the reasons for a merger but think that an effort to get people that have viewed the non-UK variants would be better suited.Anthony of the Desert (talk) 17:22, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, but a merge should not lose anything. The final article should include all valid content from both articles. - Fayenatic (talk) 16:55, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Please dont merge the two. There are distinct differences in the telling of the story. Anthony of the Desert (talk) 16:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class BBC articles
- Low-importance BBC articles
- WikiProject BBC articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- Start-Class British television articles
- Low-importance British television articles
- British television task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles