This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This (excellent) article seems to be written according to WP:FICTENSE but since it is factual it should be past tense, e.g. "He quickly rises through the ranks and gains the trust" I think should read "He quickly rose through the ranks and gained the trust". However, I don't want to do all that work unless there is consensus.--Shantavira|feed me11:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe one should first make sure the movie is factual. Mads Brügger made another famous and sensational documentary about the mysterious death of Dag Hammarskjöld, which (in addition to incriminating Western powers) expanded into a huge conspiracy story about South Africa allegedly inoculating black Africans with HIV through a fake vaccination program. I am not saying Brügger is insincere, but if he were, we would not want to have presented his work as undisputed fact in an encyclopedia. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The only critical voices mentioned in the article are from North Korea. They claim it is all a fabrication. (Well, of course they do!) Are there no other critical voices? Elias (talk) 09:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It is a mockumentary. It is not factual. Read the lead, where it says, "Brügger decides to inject into the story a "Mr. James" (Jim Latrache-Qvortrup), pretending to be a possible investor". Also, read The Guardian review which is a referenced source in the article. I don't know how to edit this article to indicate that it is not factual, as I don't want to get into a huge tendentious argument with other editors.--FeralOink (talk) 13:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this documentary were a movie, it would be criticised for its sloppy plot. Many elements are so unbelievable that some doubt should be uttered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ci47 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]