Talk:The Micallef P(r)ogram(me)

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Television Mid‑importance

	Australia portal The Micallef P(r)ogram(me) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

What was Petrenko banned for saying? [anonymous]

It was for reinstating "(despite the fact that the word is spelt 'program' in Australian English)" repeatedly, even though Australians would more likely spell it "programme". 72.74.234.205 00:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um, that edit's still on the page and was there all through the lockdown. --McGeddon 01:46, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I remember reading an interview with Shaun Micallef (in the Courier-Mail or The Sydney Morning Herald) in which he said the show was called The Micallef Programme because it sounded like "The title of a Robert Ludlum novel" or something like that... I haven't put it in the article because I can't find a hard cite for it. Anyone able to track it down at all? --Commander Zulu 14:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's a quote about it on http://www.abc.net.au/abcinternational/s21233.htm, from thirty seconds' Google searching, if you want to add it. --McGeddon 15:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Programme v Program

Programme tends to be the preferred option of an older generation of Australians who have not been brought up with the use of computers and US-centric spell checkers. The idea that because the ABC broadcasts a substantial amount of British TV this has influenced viewers to spell programme with the 'me' on the end is unsubstantiated. There is no citation for this supposition. If anyone has a link they can throw up I'm happy to add it. If there is no strong objection I'll change the wording of the article to a more neutral view point. Ozdaren 13:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The spelling of program in Australia has long been controversial (possibly since the adoption of the French spelling in the 19th century). Certainly the left has been happy to use "program" since its official adoption by the Gough Whitlam government in 1973 for use by the Australian government. I have used it since the 1970s, long before the invention of computer spell-checkers. The right on return to governments has tended to resurrect the French spelling, especially John Howard, and to pretend that there is only one correct Australian way to spell it.--Grahame (talk) 14:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More neutral? The introduction of political viewpoints and their preferences for spelling is hardly making the article more neutral. It is barely relevant and reduces the impact of what you are trying to convey. Your use of brackets and passive sentences also reduces the readability of your contribution. Please do not add this to the article in this form. Andmark (talk) 00:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The left and the right? Show me a source for that claim. Programme is the British spelling and since Australia is a British country that's how it was always spelt until we became Americanised. I propose moving the page to The Micallef P(r)ogram(me) as this is the title used on the DVD of all 3 series. McLerristarr (Mclay1) (talk) 23:44, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P(r)ogram(me)

Should "P(r)ogram(me)" really be in the title? Shouldn't it just be The Micallef Program with the other titles in brackets at the start of the article? Lachlanusername (talk) 14:33, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why would we use that title? That was the first name of series. If we were going to pick one name, we should use the most recent name, which is The Michallef Pogram; however, the DVD set used The Micallef P(r)ogram(me) as the collective name so it only seems appropriate that we do that here too. That's what the series calls itself so we can't make up our own name for it. McLerristarr | Mclay1 02:16, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Micallef P(r)ogram(me). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051225194907/http://www.shaunmicallef.com:80/quotes.html to http://www.shaunmicallef.com/quotes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]