Talk:The Magical Worlds of Harry Potter/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The Flash {talk} 02:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Hiya. I caught this quaint little article while sifting through GAN, and it's a sure-fire pass for GA. I'll be conducting the review in the manner of Talk:I Married Marge/GA1. Let's start. :) The Flash {talk} 02:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- Short but to the point—nice.
Content
[edit]- "Colbert explains in the introduction of his book[...]" → "[...]of the book[...]" as to not confuse readers that you're talking about a different book.
- There's some times where it strays from "he explains" to "he commented," so please pick one tense to stick with.
Background
[edit]- Please explain that his nephew and nieces are children before you refer to them as "the children."
- Wikilink to Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone.
- Perhaps change "[...]began to notice mythology references in the book" to "[...]notice mythological references[...]"
- Can you merge the second and third sentences in the last paragraph?
Publication and reception
[edit]Same as above—work with fixing tenses to be consistent.- Not done What parts are you referring to? Theleftorium 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Never mind, after another read, the issues I had with that are to minor to count. The Flash {talk} 17:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Not done What parts are you referring to? Theleftorium 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- "The Magical Worlds of Harry Potter has been praised for learning children about literature and history" → "[...]praised for teaching children[...]"
- Please give a brief explanation about the Narnia book, like what you said about the Lord of the Rings one.
Images
[edit]- Can you add one of these images? From what I can tell, book FU images are like those of films and video games: infobox images are perfectly fine to use for identification purposes.
- I don't feel an infobox image is useful here. Theleftorium 17:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Any particular reason, though? The Flash {talk} 18:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- I just don't see why we should use a non-free image in this article when it's not useful. Theleftorium 18:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- It is useful—identification purposes. The Flash {talk} 19:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- People can identify the book by reading the text, IMO. Theleftorium 19:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- The people at WP:NFC seemed okay with it so I've added the cover art. I can't come up with any ALT text for it so feel free to do that yourself if you think it's necessary for GA. Theleftorium 21:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks; I've added ALT text for you. The Flash {talk} 03:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- It is useful—identification purposes. The Flash {talk} 19:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- I just don't see why we should use a non-free image in this article when it's not useful. Theleftorium 18:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Any particular reason, though? The Flash {talk} 18:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- I don't feel an infobox image is useful here. Theleftorium 17:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Both images are fine—but can you please add some ALT text?
Final say
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Nice work! I'm going ahead and passing it. Thanks for your diligence throughout. :) The Flash {talk} 03:25, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Thank you very much for the review! :) Theleftorium 10:52, 3 January 2010 (UTC)