Talk:The Louvre (song)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 08:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- for her sophomore album → According to Wikipedia's Manual of Style, "sophomore" shouldn't be used here; use "second" here
- indie rock and ambient music → Links to those genres
- It derives its name from the Louvre → Its name derives from the Louvre
- talk about Lorde's honest, lightly-manic analysis of a newly-sparked romance → this info should be in the article's body, so a ref wouldn't be needed here
- landing in several year-end lists → with it landing in several year-end lists
- "Born to Run" → add release year in brackets afterwards
- The track centers around themes of obsession and sacrifice as it continues the narrative established in the previous song, "Homemade Dynamite". → This should be in the first paragraph; I can't find this info in the article's body!
- and it is on the set list of her ongoing Melodrama World Tour (2017–2018). → It is currently part of the set list of her...
Infobox
[edit]- Flawless ;)
Recording and composition
[edit]- "The Louvre" at three different → "The Louvre" in three different
- additional production to the song → replace "song" with "track" here to avoid repeating yourself
- You should cite the album's liner notes at the end of the first paragraph
- "The Louvre" is described as a song about the early → "The Louvre" revolves with the early
- describe it as a "wide-eyed, heart-skippy pop" song → described it as a "wide-eyed, heart-skippy pop" track
- The track reveals the singer's → Its lyrics also reveal the singer's
- Picture > Don't know what "(Richelieu wing pictured)" should mean
- Everything else seems on point
Critical reception
[edit]- In a review roundup for The Fader → comma after "The Fader"
- to the The Cure → to the work of The Cure
- Stereogum placed the song as number 13 → Stereogum placed the recording at number 13
- but the song also served as a reminder → ,with the song serving as a reminder
- ranked the song at number 42 in its year-end list → ranked the track at number 42 in his year-end list
- Spin placed the song at number 9 on its year-end list → In Spin's year-end list, "The Louvre" was ranked at number nine
- calling the internal monologue → with the publication calling...
Live performances
[edit]- The box "titled back-and-forth above [the singer's] head." → This sentence doesn't make any sense
- giving the full performance a → giving it a (to avoid repeating yourself)
- a departure from the black chiffon → "a departure from" is not the right wording here
Credits and personnel
[edit]- Flawless ;)
Other stuff
[edit]Copy-violation
[edit]- 18.7% is very good!
Media
[edit]- Images seems stable
References
[edit]- As far as I checked them, the references do cover the assertations made in this article
- No dead links! Good job!
Outcome
[edit]- Apart from a few issues in the lead, the article seems to be in a very good shape. I've put it
On hold for 7 days! Best; Cartoon network freak (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- I just fixed the article using all your feedback. Thank you so much for reviewing this. Had no idea someone would pick it up so soon! De88 (talk) 15:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Gladly passing! Congrats; Cartoon network freak (talk) 17:10, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- I just fixed the article using all your feedback. Thank you so much for reviewing this. Had no idea someone would pick it up so soon! De88 (talk) 15:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.