Talk:The Lost 45s

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

No reason to have two pages on the same subject. Makes one or the other redundant. Postcard Cathy 16:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, one page on one subject is enough. But what's the other page? I suggest you mark them with {{mergefrom}} and {{mergeto}}, respectively. --Alvestrand 17:09, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just added POV and "Peacock" tags. The entire article sounds like it was written by a PR person trying to publicize the subject matter; in fact, it seems plausible that the entire article was cut-and-pasted from some piece of promo material. Seems the article should be rewritten from the ground up, in a neutral tone, consistent with an encyclopedic entry. --134.174.110.7 (talk) 20:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An ugly page that is almost painful to look at, let alone read. Needs much, much work. 70.88.213.74 (talk) 01:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]