Talk:The Lords of Altamont
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This article sounds like a press release. Aqualad5000 (talk) 03:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Aqualad
Why this name with such a terrible association?
[edit]I see no explanation on why they chose the name they did which has such a terrible association! Rolling Stones at Altamont?!?! Hells Angels killing some poor unfortunate??? So why the name Altamont? That should be in there. In fact the reasoning behind a band name should always be included. Amedeofelix (talk) 11:11, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Low-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Start-Class Rock music articles
- Low-importance Rock music articles
- WikiProject Rock music/Garage rock taskforce articles
- WikiProject Rock music articles