Talk:The Lodger (Doctor Who)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 00:25, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Will get to this review soon. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 00:25, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• I'm not sure how needed the ref ([1]) is in the main plot section. See Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary#Citations for more info on this

That's really it. Images and links check out. Great job with the article! Ruby 2010/2013 04:18, 18 December 2011 (UTC)