Jump to content

Talk:The Local

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

It would be useful if someone could be found who has insight into "The Local"'s business model and editorial policy and could comment on it. On examining the site, I found that there are numerous so-called "sponsored articles." These are article-length advertisements for various companies and services--the online equivalent of infomercials on TV. I haven't seen this on other news sites yet. It would be interesting to know more about it. PhiladelphiaBoy (talk) 16:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know one of their writers. I will ask him if he feels like directing me to some info. JMEscriva (talk) 14:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

German-language article

[edit]

Hi, a version of this in German language would be favourable: de:The Local -- Cheers Horst-schlaemma (talk) 13:44, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Political leanings

[edit]

They can't be perfectly neutral, so do they lean left or right in editorial?--74.57.167.219 (talk) 06:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Czech edition

[edit]

The article fails to mention they have a Czech edition although updates seem to be rather intermittent at the moment. 86.146.219.201 (talk) 01:11, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

[edit]

While this article is short and not very informative (it merely repeats claims of the company promoted on this page), it is still dubious. The impact of "The Local" in Europe is unclear, it seems certain that there is none. On this page there are claims, that there are "local teams" for local news - but the "news" on the sites don't even have names of the writer. Googling any sentence of any news post on this site will list dozens to hundreds of generic news sites repeating them word for word, as they are generically generated for other Ad- and PR-bait sites just like "The Local". I vote for removal, as this wiki page merely is an Ad for a highly dubious business. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThomasG-gPM (talkcontribs) 00:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is a real paper, with a staff of real journalists in each country where it publishes. Serving a real community of Expats fluent in English but not in the local language. Removing this tag and replacing it with "Primary" template for article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know which version Thomas is talking about but I tested the Swedish version and of the three articles I checked all seemed to be original. They have a list of staff, including journalists, at their web site [1]´and they were nominated for Digital newapaper of the year. On a more personal note, I find that the paper reports Swedish news much in the same way as other Swedish news organisations. I agree with E.M.Gregory that this is a real paper. Sjö (talk) 10:37, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Local. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]