Talk:The Librarians (2014 TV series)

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Text and/or other creative content from this version of The Librarians (2014 TV series) was copied or moved into List of The Librarians episodes on 04:14, 3 November 2015. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Episodes shown out of order?

I know it's pretty common with a series like this for the episodes to be shown out of order for one reason or another (often executive meddling). I'm putting a reminder note here to check for reports of that with this show, I just binged the first 8 episodes & episode 8, continuity wise, looks like it should have been the 3rd episode since Cassandra is entirely out of favor with the rest of the team & explicitly says she just betrayed the team a few days ago. It doesn't make any sense that it happens that far after the other episodes & adventures they've shared.JamesG5 (talk) 20:57, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John Rogers talks about the broadcast order, and mentions probably changing the order for the DVD, here: http://kfmonkey.blogspot.com/2015/01/librarians-016-fables-of-doom-answer.html DarkProdigy (talk) 02:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, nice to know I'm not crazy. Will look for additional reliable sources, thanks.JamesG5 (talk) 10:07, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As noted, this happens all the time. It's not really encyclopedic. --Drmargi (talk) 10:13, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I've seen entries for a number of other shows where that's included in discussion of them. What's the threshold for notability there?JamesG5 (talk) 00:50, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 June 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:50, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

– Per WP:MOS, the two series should be specified by country, not by year, as this show is in the US and the former show was in Australia. I requested this as a technical request yesterday, but after being moved it was reverted 10 minutes later, so I think this formal move request should give an official decision. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:1821:1A4C:90DF:6E20 (talk) 19:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As I stated, per WP:NCTV, prefixing the year of release or progam debut is acceptable and even listed as a way to name articles. The guideline does not force either to be used, and therefore, it is perfectly fine as it stands. -- Alex^TW 01:57, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – While there's nothing "wrong", per se, with switching from "disambiguation by year" to "disambiguation by country", both articles have been at these locations for some time in this particular case, and thus can be considered "stable". No reason to move them (esp. as the "by country" redirects already exist). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:42, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As stated above, WP:NCTVUS states that either the country of broadcast or the year can be used to disambiguated identically titled TV series. As long as they're consistent with one another, either method is fine. V2Blast (talk) 09:49, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, in this case, starting the articles out with disambig. by country would have been preferable. But it's all water under the bridge now, and it's too late to change it – disambig. by year is acceptable in any case, and these articles have been disambig'ed this way for some time now and are "stable" at their current titles. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Concept?

Could someone explain the concept behind this show? The article talks about the plot, but seems to assum the readers are familiar he background. That means it doesn't supply enough info for readers wondering what it's about. Pkeets (talk) 15:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added some info myself. Pkeets (talk) 15:15, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]