Talk:The Legend of Korra season 2

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 July 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Television: Episode coverage / Nickelodeon Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

The Legend of Korra organization RfC

I've set up a request for comment (RfC) on the talk page of the article about the series about how to organize the topic into subarticles. If you are interested, I'd appreciate it if you would add your opinion in that RfC. Sandstein 06:59, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Info for episodes that haven't come out yet

If the episode hasn't aired yet why is there information in their summary sections? Until they come out I'm blanking the summaries for episodes 11-14, they're all speculation. Mrmoustache14 (talk) 02:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One source: Reception

The "reception" section relies almost exclusively on the opinions of IGN's Max Nicholson, especially in the third paragraph. More diverse views should be incorporated--maybe even some criticisms? I can't be the only person on the internet who thought there were some issues... 64.58.7.42 (talk) 16:53, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:The Legend of Korra (Book 1) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More Balanced Criticism

The criticism section is almost universally positive biased, when nearly all the references contain negative criticisms as well. In addition, plenty of non-positive reviews exist. It's a disservice to only mention/reference the positive aspects of a season. It would be nice to have a more balanced and well-rounded criticism section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.65.50 (talk) 19:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide examples of critical opinions from reliable sources that you think should be mentioned? Sandstein 19:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing Vandalism

There's someone dedicated to vandalizing this article, making up new characters and inserting them into episode descriptions and changing things around. Is there any way to easily block and undo this? MythicFox (talk) 09:54, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide diffs? Sandstein 15:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it looks like someone seems to have gotten to it. But to see how extensive it was, check the comparison for the two most recent versions in the history. MythicFox (talk) 17:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A certain degree of vandalism is routine and to be expected, and is often quickly addressed. In frequent cases (several times per day), it can be reported to WP:AIV. Admins will then address it. Sandstein 20:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]