Talk:The Legend of Hell House

Horror Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

'CORPOATION'

The opening titles manage to misspell the word 'CORPORATION' in the copyright notice under 'THE LEGEND OF HELL HOUSE'. Noteworthy? 78.150.121.14 (talk) 22:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plastics

I'm questioning the statement that "plastics hadn't been invented before Belasco died in 1927". The article on plastic in Wikipedia establishes that Bakelite, celluloid, and PVC had all been invented before 1927, and that there was an explosion in plastics technology following WWI. If memory serves, it's not specified what kind of plastic Belasco's prostheses are made from, or even if they are entirely plastic or merely have an outer plastic shell. Does Fischer even state that they are plastic, or does he simply exclaim that they are "fake"? Can anyone check and fix as needed? 12.22.250.4 21:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Legend of Hell House.jpg

Image:The Legend of Hell House.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]