This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
"based on court transcripts and interviews with the clinicians, scientists and the barrister involved with the outbreak". I assume the barrister wasn't involved with the outbreak, but with the subsequent court case. Can this be reworded? -- Colin°Talk13:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The paragraph on the court case is unsourced (the paragraph ends with a citation to Shooter's report, which precedes the case). Do we have a source on this portion of the text? -- Colin°Talk13:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for these comments. I painted myself into a corner with regard to the role of the barrister! I have added as a source a review from The Journal of Hospital Infection. Graham Beards (talk) 14:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I added another review. I see we have a reference "Pallen pp.254–259". Is that an adequate citation to the book itself? Pallen has authored other books and texts. -- Colin°Talk14:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]