Talk:The Lass of Richmond Hill
Appearance
A fact from The Lass of Richmond Hill appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 January 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
In encyclopaedias, people are normally referred to by their last name. Is there a reason to treat Frances l'Anson differently? Surtsicna (talk) 15:27, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Well, the main reason I reverted you was that the name was wrong: it's I'Anson not Anson. In an earlier version I mentioned her father in the first sentence and it was to distinguish her from him - I'd forgotten that I removed that when I reverted you. However, looking at it again, in this context the surname does seem inappropriate. It's effectively a discussion of a character in a song rather than real person in a bio piece (although literally it is a bio piece) and I think the context lends itself more to "Frances". DeCausa (talk) 15:42, 2 January 2013 (UTC)