Talk:The Larger Bowl (A Pantoum)

Canada: Music Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Where's the mandolin solo? Isn't that "Workin' them Angels"? --The Fwanksta May 19, 2007, 14:46.

Also, I just realized, I'm not sure how to cite it if it is true. The liner notes for the album say that he plays bouzouki and mandolin on the album, but what instruments are played on specific songs is never accredited. As far as I know, it's un-citeable. --The Fwanksta May 19, 2007, 22:34.

Including lyrics

There is already a link provided in the article for what a pantoum is. It is unnecessary to include the lyrics to the entire song to provide an example. If anything, one stanza should be properly quoted using {{cquote|. When an article is classified as a stub it invites users to broaden and expand the information ABOUT the song - how it materialized in the brain of Mr. Peart, what was the inspiration, has it influenced other lyricists, the meaning of the song in general as stated by the author (if it can be supported by secondary sources). I am going to revert the inclusion of lyrics for now. Wisdom89 16:59, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:NOT#INFO —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisdom89 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious - is this a general policy of not including lyrics? Not a big deal I guess, but it just seems strange - if there's one thing about a song that someone might want to find out by looking it up in Wikipedia, it seems to me it would be the lyrics. I would expect all song articles to have complete lyrics for the subject song. Yes, I know, there are plenty of "lyric database" sites out there, but if you've ever visited them, you know they are filled with irritating ads and popups and anyway who knows if they're accurate? I'd certainly rather get my info about lyrics here, where at least the content is "peer reviewed"! Branchc (talk) 15:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry, I see now the referenced guideline at WP:NOT#LYRICS. Still seems unfortunate to me, but I understand. Branchc (talk) 14:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Snakesandarrows.jpg

The image Image:Snakesandarrows.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]