This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
A well deserved award. Her books are good. I haven't read them all but of those that I have read this was the best. The sibling "reunion" in the latter part of the novel is particularly poignant. The writing and the issues raised make this a book of interest to all readers, not just young adults. -- Derek Ross | Talk07:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here and at Rosemary Sutcliff I have introduced as a source [ref name=taliesin] the 1986 "Modern Arthurian Literature" interview. I have barely utilized it --here only concerning the children/adult and the Arthurian dimensions of classifying the novel. It should be used intensively, at least concerning influences and origins. --P64 (talk) 00:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]