Talk:The Lakes, Western Australia

Australia: Places / Western Australia / Perth Low‑importance

	Australia portal The Lakes, Western Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Perth (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Western Australia may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Woottating?

Is Woottating worth mentioning as a 'community'? There's nothing but state forest and farmland between The Lakes and York... I lived in York for years, have made that trip many times, and I've only ever seen that name on maps. Anyone have an interest in this? If not, I might just scrub it.

Bird of paradox 20:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe there might be up to at least 3 abandoned communities in the space of road that you travelled - some very small and non notable - I would just leave it for the moment - they wont necessarily show up on current maps either. I dont have usuall access to net - give me a week Satu Suro 05:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit reversion

@JarrahTree:I can understand you reverting my removal of the acronym, given this subsequent edit, but I can't see any reason for reverting "replace underscores with spaces, add punctuation, remove space before ref", as you did here. I'm presuming that it was simply a mistake (reverting two edits instead of one), so I've reapplied the non-acronym edits: [1][2][3][4]. If you still disagree with them, please explain why. Mitch Ames (talk) 10:52, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]