Talk:The L Word season 5

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

More copyvio info

Reviewing admin, please note that there is even more copyright violation than Earwig is picking up; for instance, compare the first episode summary with this episode summary at IMDb: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0994315/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl. Thanks. Innisfree987 (talk) 04:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Primefac, thanks for beginning removing the copyvio from this piece. I wanted to flag to make sure you saw how much more remains--even just in the six sentences of the first episode summary, there are at least two phrases that are directly lifted, and several more with just one or two words rearranged from the original at IMDb. I'd suggested we just go ahead and delete all the episode summaries, to give a clean start if/when someone wants to come along and write them in their own words, rather than try to revise this insufficiently paraphrased version. To me there's just too much plagiarism mingled throughout for it to make sense to try to excise sentence by sentence. Innisfree987 (talk) 19:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's fine. I was dealing with 21 other copyvios at the time so I was mostly just taking a "direct-copy" approach to the removals. I have no issues with blanking the summaries and letting others re-fill them in. Primefac (talk) 00:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]