Talk:The L.A. Complex

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed Merge

I propose that the articles, listed below, about characters who appear in this TV series are given a section on the program's article rather than their own individual articles:

Callanecc (talk) 05:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All of these articles contain copyrighted content from [1]. I am marking them for speedy deletion. Spencer Bliven (talk) 06:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Yes. They should be speedied. Nymf _hideliho! 07:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)~~[reply]

Seems the copyvios was removed. Let's just redirect them (since there is no content left) and get it over with then. Nymf _hideliho! 08:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nymf & Spencer Bliven. I have removed the {{merge from}} tag on this article's entry. Callanecc (talk) 09:27, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Minor editing question

I was just curious as to why the edits that I fixed are continually taken off.

1. I added Paul F. Tompkins and Mary Lynn Rajskub to the cast section under "Special Guest Stars" due to their notability. Granted,they were only in two episodes in scenes with Joe Dinicol at the comedy club and are not a major part of the show, but they are established comedians playing exaggerated versions of themselves (which I found was really cool), so I thought I'd add them. It's not like they are some random guest stars and they do have their own Wikipedia page.

2. Although I did not make the original edit, I was wondering why some editor is getting rid of the SOURCED mention that the show had been cancelled in the States. There is a valid source that is right next to that part of the page and I am wondering what's wrong with it? Any help would be appreciated.65.94.244.110 (talk) 19:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to #2, it's back in the article, but I think other editors like confirmation that it has been cancelled rather than it "not appearing" on CW's next schedule. I changed the wording till official news arrives, which should not be removed. — WylieCoyote (talk) 23:24, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Just wanted some confirmation. I was only wondering as there ws a source and somebody was taking it off without announcing why. I tried looking for confirmation elsewhere and could not see anything about it's being renewed by the CW on the web. I must have misread this particular article and just was wondering why someone else had a problem with it. I have had problems in the past with people taking off sourced articles without no explanation so I was a bit annoyed. Thanks for the clarification, CAWylie.66.130.78.67 (talk) 21:54, 1 June 2012 (UTC) samusek2[reply]

You're welcome. Editors not listing their reasons are very annoying to me, too. I wish a flag would pop up with every edit, even minor ones, for them to list why. Most are put back in by those like me simply because they DON'T give a legitimate reason for the removal. In any case, the CW may or may not give an official cancellation. We will see. — WylieCoyote (talk) 00:47, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]