Talk:The Krotons

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Doctor Who Mid‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Idea rediscovery

Later, assistant script editor Terrance Dicks found the story in the production office files when clearing a backlog, and decided to develop it with Holmes as a personal project, in case other scripts fell through.

My DWM collection is miles away, but my recollection of the 1994 Winter Special (devoted to Holmes) is that it reproduces Holmes' 1968 attached submission letter and that a) the story may have been submitted to Donald Tosh rather than Gerry Davis; and b) it was Holmes who rediscovered it in his own files and decided to resubmit it (with a "if it's not suitable, don't bother returning it"). Can anyone check for sure? Timrollpickering 14:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Story replaced

According to Frazer Hines in an interview on the CD of The Invasion, the episode that was replaces later evolved into The Worm That Turned on The Two Ronnies.

The story was "The Prison in Space" by (IIRC) Dick Sharples and a synopsis appeared in two issues of Doctor Who Magazine in the late # 190s. Is there any evidence that Sharples took the idea to The Two Ronnies? A future where the gender power balance has been inverted is a relatively common feature in fiction and I wonder if Hines based his comments on anything other than the similarities. Timrollpickering 13:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the interview, Frazer received information (I think it might have been in a form of the revised script) that the original storyline had been utilised in The Prison in Space. He does not quote the source exactly (and at the moment, I cannot remember the exact phrasing he used), but it does sound like the the source was a reliable one. He never mentioned the magazine. Has anyone got a copy of The Invasion CD to hand so that they can listen again to the interview? StephenBuxton 13:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kroton (doctor who).jpg

Image:Kroton (doctor who).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Audio

It's not in the article, but hasn't this story been released as an audio recording on CD? I'm not sure why they're releasing these since they exist in the archives in their entirity and have been released on video. Does anyone know why it's been released? And who would want to buy an audio only copy if it's available to be watched? Surely it can't be for the benefit of blind people, otherwise why not release something more popular like Talons of Weng Chiang? I can't imagine why anyone would spend £15 of their money on such a thing - surely these can't be selling well. Either way it needs to be in the article, but I haven't got the exact release date.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 18:11, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary is crap

I do not have time or interest in fixing the problem myself—I am a bad Wikipedian. Sorry.

I just finished watching this serial. There are exactly two (2) Krotons. The plot summary refers to the Krotons, plural, being destroyed four times. There are references to forests, pyramids, and a lake of acid, all of which are missing from the actual serial. (The Gond scientist manufactures all the sulphuric acid used in the story.) Perhaps someone else more motivated can use a proper source—maybe TARDIS Index File—to clean up the summary. — crism (talk) 05:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two Krotons, yes. It's surprising just how often Patrick Troughton's stories featured just two alien adversaries - two Dominators for example. I suspect that the person writing the plot summary may have read the Target novelisation, which as I recall does have several variations from "what really happened" (this was typical for Target). I would not wish tardis.wikia.com to be used as a source, because it's an open wiki, which fails WP:SPS. But there have been dozens of books published since The Making of Doctor Who kicked them off in 1972. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Krotons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]