Talk:The Kings of Wessex Academy

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Victuallers 23:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC) Who changed the alumni...[reply]

What's your game?

I (User:Kappa) removed the alumni (you can see from the edit history) [1]. Wikipedia would get into trouble if it left insulting information about random people on its pages, even if it is true. If I have removed people who really should be mentioned in an encylopedia, put them back, but please include some evidence which we can check, like a link to a news report. Kappa 16:55, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oi, Cheesy Dave. Is it true you call yourself Cheesy Dave cos your from Cheddar?

With respect to the section on Controversies, the school trip to Geneva which ended up in a brothel really should be mentioned: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article110763.ece 87.112.215.7 (talk) 00:29, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Kings of Wessex Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614021816/http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/artsmark/local/media/downloads/Spreadsheet%20for%20website.xls to http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/artsmark/local/media/downloads/Spreadsheet%20for%20website.xls

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Old Ofsted reports (2010 & earlier?)

The old Ofsted reports no longer seem to be available at the given links (specifically, the Ofsted 2010 report). Attempting to find them on the Ofsted website only finds the provider since it became an Academy (URN 136783), and not the previous school reports.

There's a schooletc report (though I don't know the site), which seems to contain the relevant information, and also lists its URN as 123896 (presumably this is the old URN), but the Ofsted website finds no results for this.

I'm wary of the phrasing that talks about the school being praised for being "amazing", etc. From that version of the report, it looks… tentatively accurate… but the Ofsted report hedges and doesn't outright say the school is amazing (there is evidence to support it?), so the article should reflect that.

It's probably worth archiving some of the other references in case those links also die. I've tried to clean up miscellaneous bits of the article. Throne3d (talk) 17:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've now archived some of the other links (all of them?) and tagged the dead ones with relevant templates using the InternetArchiveBot (which has archived some of the links on this page before). Haven't looked further for non-dead Ofsted links. Throne3d (talk) 00:40, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peacock terms or promotional langauge

I note a banner has been added to this article saying "This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information"( which makes it appears on the WikiProject Somerset Cleanup listing). What specific words or phrases need to be removed or reworded?— Rod ^talk 13:51, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have since discussed this with User talk:KH-1, who placed the banner, at User talk:KH-1#The Kings of Wessex Academy & "peacock" banner and propose to remove the banner unless anyone objects.— Rod ^talk 20:56, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The banner is still there (2024). I can't see any current reason for it and will remove it. There is positive language but it is sourced. I checked the discussion here. Tacyarg (talk) 10:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Kings Academy logo.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:38, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]