Talk:The Journal of Collective Negotiations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

David Dilts

David A. Dilts is co-author of a quote in the lead of this article. That citation is from 1990. For truth-in-advertising purposes, Dilts became editor of the Journal of Collective Negotiations in 2003. ("David A. Dilts, Ph.D." School of Business and Management Sciences. Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne. Accessed 2009-07-01.) - Tim1965 (talk) 22:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merging duplicate article

A duplicate article with some odd POV commentary and occasional vandalism has existed at Journal of collective negotiations since July 2009. I want to make it into a redirect to back here, but first I'm making sure we don't lose any valid edits from that article over the last several months. Can anyone verify or comment on the following claims, before merging them into the original article?

"the journal was defunct in the years 2001, 2002, and 2004"
"Since [the 2004 changes], most of the authors in the journal come from [Indiana University–Purdue University Fort Wayne]"
included in subjects of journal articles: "the minimum wage"

I realize the duplicate article and commentary was added by someone with an axe to grind, but I tried to highlight the most rational statements to insure we retain any apt descriptions and not throw the baby out with the bathwater. I hope I'm not naively walking into the middle of some kind of battlefield, since I see this article has been indefinitely semi-protected since June 2009 (right before the duplicate was created). ——Rich jj (talk) 16:30, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would argue that anything lacking citation be rejected. The first two claims are challengeable; the third probably not so (and might be added without citation). - Tim1965 (talk) 01:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes

This article is one of a number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.

The following request appears on that page:

Many of the articles were selected semi-automatically from a list of indefinitely semi-protected articles.
Please confirm that the protection level appears to be still warranted, and consider unprotecting instead, before applying pending changes protection to the article.

Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes" would be appreciated.

Please update the Queue page as appropriate.

Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially

Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:21, 17 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Journal of Collective Negotiations/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The article is just a re-hash of what the editor includes on the publisher's website. It adds no value to the encyclopedia and needs to be removed (unless it is substantially improved).

Last edited at 18:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 08:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)