Talk:The Janoskians/Archive 1

Opinions

"Now Nearly Having 1,000,500 Subscribers The Janoskians Are Becoming a sensation around the world." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.141.139.138 (talk) 23:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition for an edit

Change the town "Glassglow" to Glasgow. IDIOT! WTF Michael Clifford is NOT a member STUPID! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.242.188.58 (talk) 19:04, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Matchu01 (talk) 17:47, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Janoskians are popular worldwide.

Tayissa Barone (7 July 2012). "Janoskians overshadow Karise show". The West Australian. Retrieved 7 July 2012.
Kate Midena (2 April 2012). "Cyber celebs shut down Luna Park. But who on earth are they?". News Limited. Retrieved 7 July 2012.
"No meet, no greet: Janoskians fans sent home". The Age. 2 April 2012. Retrieved 7 July 2012.
Adrian Lowe (3 April 2012). "Police pull the pin on web pranksters' Luna Park fest". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 7 July 2012.

You consider Australia as "worldwide"? Night of the Big Wind _talk 00:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In The Netherlands they are popular too. All girls and boy talk about these new video's. 150elias (talk) 21:07, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 17 May 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

i think you may want to use some of these websites, some about the Jacksonians and ways fans can talk to them. http://jaibrooksofficial.tumblr.com/ http://lukebrooks.tumblr.com/ http://twitter.com/#!/jaibrooks1 http://twitter.com/#!/luke_brooks http://twitter.com/#!/janoskians https://twitter.com/#!/James_Yammouni http://twitter.com/#!/brooksbeau http://janoskianfacts.tumblr.com/ http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/janoskians-facts http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/janoskian-facts http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/janoskians-fan-fiction http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/janoskians-fanfiction http://www.ustream.tv/channel/janoskians http://www.facebook.com/pages/Seagulls/360193244020023 http://www.facebook.com/pages/Just-Another-Name-Of-Silly-Kids-In-Another-Nation-Skip/128749913915747 http://twitcam.livestream.com/a0k8r http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73H3Caaiqms http://www.facebook.com/dogsaregonnabark 124.190.89.198 (talk) 12:42, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Twitter and Facebook are not reliable sources, and all sources on Wikipedia need to meet WP:RS Mdann52 (talk) 10:10, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 8 June 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

[[File:http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?um=1&hl=en&sa=X&biw=1280&bih=699&tbm=isch&tbnid=Hq0kulFYfisUZM:&imgrefurl=http://www.facebook.com/Janoskians&docid=ustyCqjilO71zM&imgurl=http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/c17.0.403.403/p403x403/543208_430014367023634_1577441750_n.jpg&w=403&h=309&ei=lQHST_jLL4K98APHycSLAw&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=400&vpy=342&dur=531&hovh=197&hovw=256&tx=131&ty=117&sig=103510870665179275394&page=1&tbnh=151&tbnw=190&start=0&ndsp=17&ved=1t:429,r:6,s:0,i:93 |thumb| Janoskians Daniel, Luke, James, Beau & Jai ]]

Heidi Brooks (talk) 13:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: All images need to be on Wikipedia or Wikipedia Commons - not Google Mdann52 (talk) 16:26, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

James isn't the youngest, Jai is the youngest. He was born two minutes after Luke therefore making him the youngest of the twins and also the youngest of the group. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmabrooksx (talk • contribs) 22:10, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Sources? -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 03:34, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 29 July 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

janoskians; Just Another Name Of Silly Kids In Another Nation Skip _______________________________________________________ Each Group Member; Jai Brooks & Luke Brooks (twins) Beau Brooks (twins older brother) James Yammounie Daniel Sahyounie

________________________________________________________ THANK YOU. YOUTUBE JANOSKIANS :D JessyBrooks143 (talk) 11:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: unsourced - you need reliable sources for the content you want added in. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 11:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 20 October 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

please could you change the year that James Yammouni was born in from 1996 to 1995 because hes 17 not 16 86.160.191.36 (talk) 18:53, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done see above comments on sourcing. gwickwire | Leave a message 19:45, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 4 November 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The janoskians charity auction was never listed as charity auction until after it was trolled after it was criticized for being greedy. Facts should be listed there. Dombomb97 (talk) 21:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Facts should also have reliable sources too. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 01:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 10 November 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Daniels's birthday is wrong. It should be the 31st of October. 217.39.60.24 (talk) 18:10, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. If you have a source, please list it here and reactivate the request. ⋘HueSatLum ? ❢⋙ 19:46, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WRONG BIRTHDAY

Daniel's (Skip's) birthday is actually October 31, 1995, NOT May 3. May 3 is Jai and Luke's birthday. I find it offensive that this issue has been looked over so many times and still not changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emillevdh (talk • contribs) 23:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not difficult to point this out on the talk page in the first place, either. I have removed the birthdates as they are unsourced and this is a BLP. Your birthdate correction won't be added either - it's unsourced. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 00:39, 21 November 2012 (UTC) He love all fans[reply]

Youtube channel

on youtube they have their janoskians account janoskiansblog and daredundays idk but its pretty much perfect — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.227.137.85 (talk) 13:21, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

) peace out dudes 8-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.237.7.81 (talk) 06:47, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Learn proper punctuation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.160.56.95 (talk) 01:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redo the entire music section its terrible

Can this page be edited to say that they are a public nuisance, and are a bunch of utter faggots? Cheers.

"Their single 'Best Friends' Made it to #1 in the iTunes Charts in countries like Sweden,"

countries like Sweden so Finland and other Nordic countries? because Finland is like Sweden

who wrote this page a 12 year old?

source things and don't use weasel words

Occupation

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Olivesandshxt (talk) 12:07, 2 November 2013 (UTC) The Janoskians are a British pop girlband they have 6 top 10 hits[reply]

Not done: no, they aren't and they haven't. --Stfg (talk) 12:49, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Just passing through this article and noticed some of the language is not neutral. Referring to stunts as "disgusting" or "crude" may be one person's opinion and another might think it not disgusting. Also they've been compared to the american tv stunt show "Jackass" which kind of popularized this sort of humor. This should be mentioned. --Turn685 (talk) 12:12, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

176.182.69.201 (talk) 13:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC) Daniel is Miley's twins.[reply]

Not done: as you have not requested a change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to any article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for protection

Enough with vandalism and irresponsible editing of this page. This page has unfortunately become a playground for fancruft, excessive non-encyclopedic language, unsubstantiated and at many times ludicrous added informations not supported by any reliable referencing, and in general a vandalism playground for lovers and of haters of this group. It is apparent almost all edits by anonymous editors is making management of this page difficult trying to rid it of daily dosage of ridiculous and sometimes very humorous nonsense and juvenile drivvel. Almost nothing positive is being added and most contributors are unregistered online bullies. This page needs permanent protection for a full year at least, with only registered users allowed to edit. The talk page can always be used to make requests for meaningful edits by non-registered users. werldwayd (talk) 08:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding a protection tag restricting editing to confirmed editors for a week. I have a feeling though that the period set is just too lenient and will expire very soon and we are back to this ludicrous pattern of editing rubbish. Fans have rendered the page frivolous and the page's management by editors almost a full time job. I do understand this is just to reinforce the public image of the band as a juvenile care free band of pranksters and to render our page the same. I think protection should be for a three month period the least. werldwayd (talk) 13:27, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lets just see what happens when the protection lapses. If there is further prank editing from IP editors there will be justification to argue for a longer period of protection. AlanS (talk) 11:46, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"This Fucking Song" is an official single

Based on the massive vandalism this page is seeing, established colleagues may tend to think "This Fucking Song" is a vandalism. But if you check the listings, this is an actual single release. See for example the Australian Charts sites, as they originate from Australia The Janoskians page on Australian charts and the "This Fucking Song" page and documentation (single cover etc) "This Fucking Song" song page werldwayd (talk) 18:36, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Renewed request for further protection of page

Let's face it. This particular page will be a mecca for vandalism par excellence by band fans and by band haters. The moment the period of protection expires, we have unscrupulous editors coming back in great numbers with their unconstructive edits to litter the page. I suggest an outright ban for anonymous users for a full year and a conditional ban on editors with user name that have less than a hundred meaningful edits to their credits. We now realize vandalism on Janoskians page will go on as long as the band continues to survive. A new ban for a lengthened period is in order. werldwayd (talk) 00:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just exactly how much more vandalism do you need on this page to establish a permanent ban on frivolous editing? All editing without a Wikipedia user name should be disallowed for a minimum of 1 year. Only editors with valid user names and with a minimum of say 300 edits to their credit in Wikipedia in various subjects should be allowed to make direct changes the page content. Those excluded can always use the talk page here to propose needed amendments and an experienced editor will look into such proposals and implement changes whenever needed. werldwayd (talk) 19:40, 13 March 2015 (UTC) werldwayd (talk) 01:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Normally I'd agree with you but you lost me when you called them a band. AlanS^talk 05:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't turn this request down on a technicality Alan. LOL. We do need to protect this page. On matter of band or no band, sure a band, why not. They do act like one. You never know, we may see them performing like a proper musical band soon. By the way, I like The Janoskians so much you couldn't believe. And I'm using this opportunity to declare publicly my "guilty pleasure" in cherishing this (ehem)... brilliant fuckingly adorable "band"... made up of obviously very charming and quite talented individuals actually. I even pleaded with other Wikipedia colleagues when I personally added their "This Fucking Song" as a single in the discography section not to revert or delete it, as this was not vandalism, but an actual Janoskian single.... (see my earlier post lovingly titled " 'This Fucking Song' is an official single") LOL werldwayd (talk) 15:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My prayers have been answered or what? The Janoskians at least in their newest hit "MoodSwings" seem to function as a proper music band. So my wild guess of they becoming a band is being realized albeit in shy small steps, but for sure. If they want to have general chart success, this is the way to go anyway. In any case, as far as Wikipedia is concerned, if The Janoskians do pursue this "musical" path further in their new releases, I am even tempted to add "the band" Janoskians to the intro of the article. werldwayd (talk) 21:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]