Talk:The Itchy & Scratchy & Poochie Show/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessment will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 21:22, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

 

Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment

---

Observations

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

• Prose is good, follows MOS

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

• Citations are accurate and well presented.
• Some link rot has been observed.
• Running the Internet Archive Bot over this page may sort that issue.

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

• Article touches a lot of bases, the coverage is sufficiently broad for this specific genre.

1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

• This particular episode flags falling ratings and in-show strategies to revive the series. As such, the coverage is remarkably neutral.
• NPOV is presented in this article

1. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

• Page created 11 July 2005
• Page has 599 edits by 307 editors and has 34 page watchers
• 90 day page views = 6,144 with an average of 68 views daily.
• Internet Archive Bot has visited twice; Cluebot NG once.
• Listed as Good Article: March 14, 2007

1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

• No images; comprehensive infobox used;

1. Overall:

• Article meets all six criteria for GA status.

 

 Passed