This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles
This article needs a lot of work, both because the film is an important work in American cinema (a fact unreflected by the scant information provided in the article) and because the article is poorly constructed and expressed. For example, the Plot section tells little about the plot, but reads more like a review at first, before meandering off into trivia about the trains used in the film, and then delving into personal opinion and colloquialism. I'm not well equipped to extrapolate effectively on the film, but perhaps someone here is, someone who can structure this like a good WP article. Right now it reads more like conversation. Thanks. Monkeyzpop (talk) 11:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
