Talk:The Incredulity of Saint Thomas (Caravaggio)

Text from www.wga.hu=

At its time, I had received permission to use some of their texts here. Bye. --Attilios 15:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure it is their text? Most of their texts are taken from other books - eg all "their" long notes on Dürer engravings are taken, uncredited and word for word but slightly shortened, from the Dover book by Walter L Strauss, which is still in copyright. I don't think they write anything themselves, as the very different prose styles on the site suggest. Did they say the text was their copyright? My guess is it comes from the guidebook to the museum the painting is in. Johnbod 01:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.wga.hu/frames-e.html?/html/c/caravagg/06/34thomas.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Cactus Writer ^(talk) 21:12, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to add information to this article

Dear Wiki-Editors,

I'm new to this space, however I'm an expert on old masters art and would like to add some information onto this article about the Trieste version of the incredulity of saint thomas. I have addinional books to citate as well as proofs auf authenticities which I'd like to add to the article. I do not presume myself of editing an article without asking first so this is the reason I'm opening this discussion. Please advise me if this isn't the right approach.

Therese are the changes that I'd like to propose:

- There are two versions of this artwort. One is located in Potsdam, which is the secular version of this artwork and the version located in trieste is the ecclesiastical version. According to Maurizio Marnini the ecclesiastical version was painted for Cardinal Gerolamo Mattei in the year 1602. It differentiates itself from the secular version that was owned by Marchese Vincenzo Giustiniani in the way that the knee to the bottom left is covered. Please see the image below as a reference. This information is from a proof of authenticity done by Mag. Art. Maria Ranacher.

- The format of the Triest version is 118 x 156,5cm

Thank you.

RfoxR (talk) 11:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]