Talk:The Incredible Human Journey

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

BBC Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British / Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Untitled

This article seems entirely un-encyclopaedic... looks more like an advert or sock-puppeted self-aggrandizement. Surely content like this should be reserved for imdb.com?

Corrupt, nepotistic, cynical, disingenuous, far-leftist BBC recycling at it's best...

http : //news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/430944.stm

...fame: http : //www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/5279787/Interview-Alice-Roberts-on-The-Incredible-Human-Journey.html

...and profiteering with a book deal: http : //www.amazon.co.uk/Incredible-Human-Journey-Alice-Roberts/dp/0747598398

...not to mention an exclusive round the world holiday.

...all supported by a coercive tax on a docile and oppressed public.

...don't it make you proud. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.94.138 (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above comment seems to be written in a state of rage. Does anyone agree with me that it should be deleted? Kristian (talk) 23:55, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alice Roberts edited out

There is no mention of why Alice Roberts was entirely edited out of the international version. If available, any information about this would be interesting. Kristian (talk) 23:45, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am in Australia and as well as owning the BBC version on DVD I recently watched the international version on subscription TV. I found the BBC version almost unwatchable with frequent "in your face" glamour shots of the undoubtedly attractive (but quite unknown over here) Roberts totally overwhelming the content. Quite irritating and unnecessary - to me the international version was far more watchable without the constant eye contact and teeth. I would bet that's why she was cut out of the international version. Friends and family watching the BBC version were also quite irritated and wanted to know if this was a serious documentary or a Roberts self promotion. Quite possibly this is why she was edited out, but of course it would be hard to find a reference. --MichaelGG (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article says that her narration was replaced in the international version by that of someone else. What was the reason for doing that? Jim Michael (talk) 01:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]