Talk:The Hunter's Moon (novel)

Novels: Fantasy Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

spoiler...

however, if people are visiting the page for other reasons, such as, to find out refrences or it it is what number in a series, that warning should stay. People don't only visit the page to get a summary, thanks. ~User: Sophiakorichi

WHAT IS EVERYBODY'S PROBLEM WITH SPOILERS??? ~Sophiakorichi

There is no problem with spoilers. Encyclopedia articles are supposed to cover fictional material completely, including the plot. Readers who don't want to learn the plot should avoid reading sections that clearly discuss it. The spoilers in the article are expected, so the spoiler tag is redundant. — Carl (CBM · talk) 14:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I vote for the spoiler tag here. That would be two editors pro-spoiler-tag, yes? We are building consensus! --Jere7my 17:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter what you "vote" for (see also WP:CONSENSUS for what consensus actually is). You'll need to provide a compelling rationale to include the template, that hasn't been done. Matthew 17:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only under WP:SPOILER is a compelling rationale necessary, and that guideline is disputed. Returning spoiler tag for the obviously compelling reason that not including them could ruin someone's enjoyment, and because a handful of anti-spoiler driveby editors are collaborating en masse to evade the three-revert rule. --Jere7my 17:08, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eh... nobody is collaborating with anybody :-\. I'm banned from the club, anyway. A few users getting upset that their placebo-like tags have been excised doesn't make a guideline disputed. Matthew 17:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's more than a few, and the WP:SPOILER page is currently marked as disputed. The pages of heated debate in the talk page would seem to support that view as well. --Jere7my 17:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then what, may I ask, was the origional purpose of spoilers if not to warn people to avoid plot description? And why, then, should pages have any spoiler warnings at all? ~Sophiakorichi