Talk:The House of Yes (play)

A fact from The House of Yes (play) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 March 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the title of the play The House of Yes came from a piece of bathroom graffiti seen by its author?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The House of Yes (play).

Wikipedia

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:02, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the title of the play The House of Yes came from a piece of bathroom graffiti seen by its author? Source: Official site, Dramatists Play Service copy of play

Reviewed: Union Station (Walpole, Massachusetts)

Created by Morgan695 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:36, 21 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - There are no citations in the infobox, lead, or synopsis section.
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Need to have lead and synopsis section sourced (at least one citation to a reliable source for each paragraph and direct quote). Other than that I don't see any problems. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 14:55, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PCN02WPS: I've added a citation confirming the genre, but otherwise infoboxes and lead sections of articles do not require citations for information that is properly sourced in the body of the article per MOS:LEADCITE. Plot sections of articles do not need to be sourced per MOS:PLOT, as it is assumed that the citation is the work itself. Morgan695 (talk) 17:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. In that case, article seems good to go. This is my first review, can I correct the review template above or should I copy in another below with the issue resolved? PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:54, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can but it's not necessary, the tick means that any issues have been resolved and the article is good to go. Morgan695 (talk) 19:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, thanks for your patience! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 00:22, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]