Talk:The Holy Trinity (The Grand Tour)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sagecandor (talk · contribs) 00:38, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look this one over and review it later. Sagecandor (talk) 00:38, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 13, 2017, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: After high quality articles including Syro, NHL 17, The 2nd Law, Right Thoughts, Right Words, Right Action, El Camino (The Black Keys album), Tonight: Franz Ferdinand, Madness (Muse song), Reflektor (song), and House of Jealous Lovers, this appears to be the first television related GA nomination by the nominator, and it is quite good. The writing quality is good, it is "clear and concise" and flows well. Good organizational structure and layout for the page. Good lede intro section which nicely introduces the reader to the topic. Good summary section, which is neutral and matter of fact.

2. Verifiable?: 22 citations formatted well in an in-line citation style for all asserted facts.

3. Broad in coverage?: Covers Introduction, Summary, Filming and production, and Release and reception. I like the choice of header titles for the sections. The article is of adequate scope and breadth for its particular episode topic.

4. Neutral point of view?: Article presents its topic in a neutral tone. Wording is matter of fact. Satisfies NPOV.

5. Stable? No edit wars going back to article creation in January 2017. No talk page problems. Article satisfies WP:WIAGA for stability.

6. Images?: 3 images used. One fair use. Two free use. Fair use has adequate fair use rationale. Free use each have okay licensing.

Good job ! If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Sagecandor (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sagecandor: Thanks for reviewing this! Aria1561 (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure, thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia ! Sagecandor (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]