Jump to content

Talk:The Hidden Hitler

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

[edit]

Calling articles in trade publications such as the Library Journal and Booklist (published by the American Library Association, an organisation taking political stances) "peer reviews" places The Hidden Hitler among publications with a predominantly commercial or political orientation.

For a book which claims any academic merits whatsoever, peer reviews clearly should be considered only those reviews actually coming from members of the respective scientific community.

145.254.161.43 07:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

whatever, this is a stupid piece of crap. just someone else trying to soil hitler's image (as if it was needed to soil it MORE) 'cause notice adolf's is being widely accepted nowadays, or at least less hated (just like kennedy said "After visiting these two places you can easily see how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had boundless ambition for his country, which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made."), so let's make up shit!
Whoever you are I kind of agree. I think Hitler was a jerk who was completely misguided. But I also see the argument that he was gay as an attempt to further demonize him from the average person. It's also an attempt to demonize the gay community by saying that only one of their own could do that kind of thing. What's even worse is that a Jewish historian wrote this - it just throws any credibility of this work out the window. Simply because of the bitterness the culture would have for Nazis. Sure the Nazis were all monsters who will burn in hell - but let's not demonize them completely, I bet a lot of the bottom rung footsoldiers were half-decent guys.

I think you guys are missing the point. In that society, as in many others, homosexuality was not tolerated. Living in a society that does not tolerate a person can be internalized and transform into self-loathing. So Hitler's use of state resources to kill millions and wage war with the world may have been partly fueled by this self-loathing that was caused by society's intolerance of his sexual orientation in the first place.Freewheel510 (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gas chambers

[edit]

Were actually Germans gassing a non-Jewish, non-Roma, not-retarded gay prisoners? I don't think they were. They had everything written down, who (after being selected to the execution) could be gassed, who shot, who hanged, and who for example killed with a fatal injection. It was illegal to break these rules. --Kocoum 07:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you guys kidding? Seriously, are you guys serious? I mean the Nazis, the elites, were all known for their bizarre sexual tastes, and you are surprised that this guy found evidence that Hitler, the freakishly evil little man, practiced homosexual sex along with his incestuous orgies? Wow, amazing to see this. Amazing the 'junk' that is out there, and how people wallow in it.71.61.151.58 15:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

[edit]

This article is in need of a "controversy" secion, especially since it lists favorable reviews from the book trade. There is considerable opinion from historians that Machtan's "research" engages in far too much speculation, i.e. taking remarks in letters out of context, inferring ulterior motives in people's actions (ex: promotions/demotions in Nazi heirarchy) without evidence, and ignoring evidence to the contrary of his thesis....The book is interesting, but comes no where near to proving anything about Hitler. Engr105th 12:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Hidden Hitler book.jpg

[edit]

Image:The Hidden Hitler book.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was hitlar in love ?

[edit]

Actually I dont know about Hitlar Love story. I want to ask if any one know about hitlar plz share with me with evidence. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.205.132.3 (talk) 12:00, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Uncited Book Reviews

[edit]

I removed citations to alleged reviews in Booklist and Library Journal. These are not citations! They have no date, no page number, issue number, volume number, nothing! How can we verify that these alleged positive reviews really exist?

If these reviews are to be included, they must have a date, volume number, issue number, page, or something!

I have no objection to putting these reviews back in-- as long as they are properly cited! Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy. 24.218.136.62 (talk) 17:30, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Hidden Hitler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Hidden_Hitler&oldid=1210077250"