Talk:The Harrowing (Inside No. 9)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 21:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'll take this one within the week. 23W 21:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks- it's appreciated! J Milburn (talk) 14:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
What a terrifying-sounding episode.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Duplication Detector spotchecks turned up nothin'.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Great article! Couldn't find much of anything wrong, which is no surprise, considering you've probably perfected the format with the other GANs for the series. Pass! 23W 20:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, thoroughly appreciated. Any comments, no matter how taxing, picky or small, are welcome. J Milburn (talk) 21:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)