Jump to content

Talk:The Great War and Middle-earth/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Artem.G (talk · contribs) 12:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Would review this one. Artem.G (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, became unexpectedly busy, would review the article by Thursday. Artem.G (talk) 11:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, sorry for long waiting. I'm back now and will review the article! Artem.G (talk) 16:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

  • "David Kosalka similarly writes" - Kosalka needs some intoduction
    • Glossed.
  • "as Friedrich Gundolf and Robert Graves did to a lesser extent" - not sure how it should be done, but maybe at least "poets and novlists Friedrich Gundolf and Robert Graves" would be a sufficient introduction
    • Done.
  • "they adapted the Romanticist 19th century approach" - maybe link to Romanticism?
    • Linked.
  • "and medieval poetry such as Beowulf." - link medieval poetry
    • Linked.
  • "but out of that of his dead TCBS friends" - what is TCBS?
    • Glossed.
  • "and the approaches to the Morannon" - maybe link Morannon?
    • Linked.
  • "Both Chris Hopkins and Michael Livingston" - they need some introductions. and is it this Michael Livingston?
    • Glossed and linked.
  • "Dome Karukoski's 2019 biographical drama film" - director should be linked and introduced
    • Done.
  • "Sheila O'Malley, reviewing the film" - same, needs intro
    • In this case, the gloss is the comma-separated phrase immediately following.
  • "reviewing the film for Roger Ebert.com" - typo? not sure what is it.
    • Formatted and glossed.

Not a lot of comments here; all the images are tagged appropriately, and the choice of images is great; all is well-sourced, no copyvio. I think that's one of your best Tolkien articles, and besides a few comments it's already at GA level. Artem.G (talk) 16:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the review and the kind words, and glad you're back. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the article, it's GA now! And I hope I'll be more active again, though covid hit me hard. Artem.G (talk) 14:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]