Talk:The Great Milenko

The Great Milenko has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 22, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Hip hop Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychopathic Records (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychopathic Records, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Psychopathic RecordsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychopathic RecordsTemplate:WikiProject Psychopathic RecordsPsychopathic Records articles

Untitled

I made a change removing the phrase "squeaky clean" for POV reasonsAyreon 01:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cover

Please don't remove the album cover off of The Great Milenko, it is a low resolution album cover off of The Insane Clown Posse's offical site, and I believe it qualifies for the Fair Use policy.

Wikipedia, how does it work?

What is with the track listing and the poor formatting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.115.27.191 (talk) 02:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Great Milenko/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adabow (talk · contribs) 21:19, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

The alternative cover grossly fails WP:NFCC #3.a and #8. If you feel that the cover is important you can discuss it in the article, but it is simply a different colour, and is not needed.
There is no section on singles, which there clearly should be, and it should be covered in the lead

Background and development

Could you rename it 'Background', and the following section 'Recording', as they seem to be similar topics?
This section doesn't lead anywhere, and doesn't even mention The Great Milenko in it

Recording process

Change 'A&R' to artists and repertoire
Hollywood Records can be linked earlier than it is
"Bruce who knew very little about the Sex Pistols..." - comma after Bruce

Musical style

Please trim File:Boogie Woogie Wu ICP.ogg to 26 seconds and lower the quality per WP:SAMPLE
"Southwest Voodoo samples the track Voodoo by X-Clan." This sentence is unreferenced and given completely without context.

Promotion and release

Mention the release dates here
1. 63 → number sixty-three (or number 63)
Likewise #1 → number one (not number 1)
"Despite the rough start, The Great Milenko has old well over the years" - typo here?
RIAA needs to be spelt out first (disregarding the lead), and a link
You can link 'certified gold' to RIAA certification
Ref 23 should go at end of sentence

Critical reception

"critics complimented the albums improved sound" - apostrophe missing in "album's"

Track listing

You don't need to cite each reference twice
What is the second release?

Charts and certification

The 'Singles' table should be converted into prose earlier in the article

References

The content of the 'Notes' and 'References' sections are around the wrong way

Looks like a good majority of these have been corrected already. I'll get started on shortening File:Boogie Woogie Wu ICP.ogg to 26 seconds and lowering the quality.--Gen. Quon (talk) 01:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've shortened and lowered the quality of File:Boogie Woogie Wu ICP.ogg. I think everything else has been achieved.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm happy with improvements made. Passed! Adabow (talk · contribs) 00:36, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... I got the target not the redirect. Si Trew (talk) 09:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Great Milenko. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/690p7Dskf?url=http://riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?resultpage=1 to http://riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?resultpage=1&table=SEARCH_RESULTS&action=&title=&artist=Insane%20Clown%20Posse&format=&debutLP=&category=&sex=&releaseDate=&requestNo=&type=&level=&label=&company=&certificationDate=&awardDescription=&catalogNo=&aSex=&rec_id=&charField=&gold=&platinum=&multiPlat=&level2=&certDate=&album=&id=&after=&before=&startMonth=1&endMonth=1&startYear=1958&endYear=2009&sort=Artist&perPage=25

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]