Talk:The Grates

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Queensland / Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal The Grates is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Access All Areas interview

An interview here might be useful to someone who wants to fill this article out a bit more. Cnwb 00:20, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Indie Rock?

I would dispute them being labelled an indie rock act. It's twee, pure and simple.

Although Fundamentally I agree, this would be hard to justify, especially since 'twee' is widely agreed to be a subgenre of ~~indie rock~~.

I'm no expert but I don't think they are that sweet or twee (they do swear a lot). I would classify them as indie rock though definetly on the boundaries. I am tempted to get rid of the indie pop tag on the page.

I agree that I don't like the indie pop tag (it's not correct), so I think I will remove it. I think there are also punk and grunge influences in their sound, but how do you justify that? 65.64.200.116 18:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

It is not the best of pictures. What happened to the previous one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.131.88.85 (talk • contribs) 03:56, August 6, 2006

The aim here is to provide free information, not pretty pictures. If you want to take a better picture, license it under a free license and upload it, you're more than welcome to. pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So you took the picture. I am not suggesting another picture is taken; another picture I think should be found. And dont give me 'pretty' picture. The picture must speak for the article. The aim certainly is not just the info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.130.158.249 (talk • contribs) 05:29, August 7, 2006

I didn't take the picture. If you click on the image description page, you'll see it's from flickr. If you want to find a better, freely licensed image, go right ahead. pfctdayelise (translate?) 04:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would, but Im dead lazy. I cant be bothered to learn how to upload pictures. Nevertheless, I hope some one agrees with me and will change the picture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.130.158.249 (talk • contribs) 06:09, August 8, 2006

Would you look at that, I actually changed the picture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.130.158.249 (talk • contribs) 06:13, August 8, 2006

That is unacceptable. Look at the tag of the publicity photo: it says it can only be used "in the absence of a free alternative". There is a free alternative now. We should not be adding copyrighted photos to Wikipedia if it can be avoided. Please do not replace it unless you have a freely-distributable alternative. Also, please sign your posts. —Chowbok 13:02, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Easy there judge judy. I'd sign my comment, but my fingers are tired.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.228.53.39 (talk • contribs) 01:06, August 11, 2006

awful awful band. it is disturbing how successful they have become considering they have no grasp on how to play an instrument or sing, and their songwriting skills are extremely lacking.

This isn't appropriate. But meh, go on for interest sake. Support your claim. 60.228.45.167 07:47, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marriage

So Patience Hodgson announced on her Twitter page that herself and John Patterson got married including pictures to back up their claim but that's not good enough for Wikipedia because the information isn't on a web site. Good Grief. Mirrabooka (talk) 16:28, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]