Talk:The Governance of China

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2010s Low‑importance

	2010s portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Academic analysis of the book

I found this: [1], and I'm going to try and see if I can include some of the interpretations of the book presented in the article. Doanri (talk) 09:30, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Very good, although I'd found the piece, I only just now realized that "talk" had been started. MinnesotanUser (talk) 02:27, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possibilities for general improvement

Possible avenues for improvement of the article at this stage include:

-detailed (but not overly so) synopsis,

-language discussing motivation for publication of work (a theme which keeps coming up in the citations: (why this book? why now? What makes Xi so special as opposed to Jintao, etc)),

-language indicating western interpretation of the work as "dry, boring" etc (easily backed up in the cites)

-language indicating that sundry "policy wonks" (just such as Swaine) regard the work as important or useful esp as a clear signal for what China wants and where it's headed etc,

-an articulation of "the Chinese Dream" as a distinct ideal,

-brief, illustrative quotes from the work in the synopsis,

-broader Chinese literary cultural context of work. I admit to not being knowledgeable of Chinese classics, but the style of presentation in both Mao LRB and GOC seems like it's part of an ancient cultural extraction, esp. checking the article for Book of Documents. This is worth a sentence or two if it is an accurate appraisal, and can be framed properly.

-editing this article has gotten me thinking about "Chinese numbered policies.", and I'm pretty confident that there's lots of stuff on wiki not categorized as such which can and should be.

"Carry on!"MinnesotanUser (talk) 02:27, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Governance of China.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:52, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]