Talk:The Gospel (film)

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Christian films task force.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Evangelical Christianity Low‑importance

	Evangelical Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Evangelical Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Evangelical Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Evangelical ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityEvangelical Christianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Gospel (film)

The title of this article can be misleading to readers, as it does not direct to what is likely to be the more widely understood meaning of "the Gospel," ie the Gospel. I would submit that, since the single distinction between the film and the more widely understood meaning of the term is the existence of a capital T in the indefinite article, the, this page could benefit by the disambiguation of being renamed, The Gospel (film). I should also note that the film's placement under its current article title effects an appearance of being a deliberate publicity move. Although this may not in fact be the case, moving the subject to a less misleading title would free it of any such appearance.

I invite comments on this before any such disambiguation is undertaken. Projection70 20:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's unnecessary. People are more likely to look under "Gospel" instead of "the Gospel" in a "go" entry or in a URL line. I changed the disambiguation at the top of the page to link to Gospel (disambiguation) to make it shorter. People can easily find what they mean there if they end up here by accident. Rigadoun 20:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - leave it as it is. Don^MEGA60645^Talk|Contribs 13:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Gospel.jpg

Image:The Gospel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Most of the plot summary is copied from the summary at IMDB: [1] Niteshift36 (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0451069/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Dpmuk (talk) 20:29, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]