Jump to content

Talk:The Gits

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

So the band broke up in 1993 but three of their albums were released after 1993? And they only have four albums total? Seems rather... Unlikely. Atinoda 05:45, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That's entirely possible, although it's more aptly called "flogging the dead horse" i.e. releasing more albums after their split with stuff they hadn't released. This is the case with quite a few bands. Nirvana have released about God-knows-how-many albums after their split. - 11:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC) THE GREAT GAVINI ONCE MORE WITH FEELING!
The Gits only had three LPs (and one live record) from 1988-1993. Two of them were also remastered posthumously, and the debut LP (Kings & Queens) was released on CD in '96. Tim010987 (talk) 02:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GITS can often stand for Ghost in the Shell

[edit]

I'm not sure how to better resolve the issue, but something should be done. 91.78.151.134 (talk) 19:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how anything can be done. GITS is a common abbreviation for the anime series. It is a circumstance which is not going to change. It's not relevant. Yes, it's confusing. What is more confusing is that there's now some band from Poland that's decided to call themselves The Gits. Aside from ignoring them, there's not much that can be done about them either. Life is confusion. That said, I don't think that anyone who types in GITS into wikipedia expecting to see an article featuring the work of Shirow Masamune is going to be fooled into thinking that it's a story about the murder of Mia Zapata. They'll figure it out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.66.146.189 (talk) 23:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image File:JesusMezquia.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Gits. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Gits&oldid=1202303042"