Talk:The Ghost Network/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 12:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
I will review this article later today. Miyagawa (talk) 12:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Review:
- Writing: Can you insert a reference directly after the sentence containing "urban myths or legends of strange events" - I presume its the audio commentary; it'll cover "no man could possibly have known about" too.
Other than that, I can't find any problems. I've made a couple of copyedits. Images all check out, although there is a typo in the free use rationale for the image in the infobox. Good job! Miyagawa (talk) 21:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- I made the ref fix per your suggestion. Let me know if the article needs anything else. Thanks for the review! Ruby2010 comment! 16:47, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Article all checks out against the GA criteria, happy to promote! Miyagawa (talk) 23:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- You have my thanks, as always :) Ruby2010 comment! 23:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC)