Jump to content

Talk:The Ghost Network/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 12:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article later today. Miyagawa (talk) 12:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review:

  • Writing: Can you insert a reference directly after the sentence containing "urban myths or legends of strange events" - I presume its the audio commentary; it'll cover "no man could possibly have known about" too.

Other than that, I can't find any problems. I've made a couple of copyedits. Images all check out, although there is a typo in the free use rationale for the image in the infobox. Good job! Miyagawa (talk) 21:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made the ref fix per your suggestion. Let me know if the article needs anything else. Thanks for the review! Ruby2010 comment! 16:47, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Article all checks out against the GA criteria, happy to promote! Miyagawa (talk) 23:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have my thanks, as always :) Ruby2010 comment! 23:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]