Talk:The George Hotel, Crawley/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 14:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

I shall review. ⇒TAP 14:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Initial Comments

• The lead is meant to summarise the article, per MOS:LEADCITE and MOS:LEAD. In the article I see no reference of "Ramada Crawley Gatwick". I did not see the "or earlier" or "16th century" bit in the article body. Per that, include in body. I don't mind "Crawley's most celebrated building", as it is a quote.

Mentioned Ramada Crawley Gatwick in the facilities section. Will expand lead later.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

History

• "At the time of the Domesday survey in 1086, no manor or village of Crawley existed,[5] but the thickly forested area was gradually being cleared and settled" — please reword this, so the "no manor or village of Crawley" is easier to read.

---

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

⇒TAP 19:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)