Talk:The Gathering Storm (novel)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:44, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, I've read this and will review. I will make straightforward copyedits as I go. I'll jot queries below. Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:44, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...~~it also addresses his struggle with his sanity following the events of the series~~ ~~- should specify (briefly) the events. Reads too vague as is.~~

~~embellishing on Sanderson's deliberations as discussed here would be good too.~~

I'll try and give this a shot. It's already cited several times in the article, I'll see if I can wean some more out of it. Яehevkor ✉ 17:05, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:25, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

one of the source pages mentions Jordan giving a verbal "gleeman-like" 2.5 hours telling of the conclusion to his wife and cousin Wilson - this'd be good to add. It'll be somewhere on the blog in '07-08 I think.

Seems to be this, I'll try and find a way to incorporate that later today. Яehevkor ✉ 12:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have incorporated it into the article. Not sure it flows too well, any other input welcome. Яehevkor ✉ 17:02, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a go at massaging it in. Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:25, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's ok. Just took a comma out. Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

One last thing, just fix up the refs as I have done with making teh accessdates look nice? Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:41, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think all the dates should be consistent now. Thank you very much for the copy edit and review! LxRv (a.ka. Rehevkor) 15:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]