Talk:The Gaslight Effect

A fact from The Gaslight Effect appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Robin Stern's book The Gaslight Effect describes gaslighting as an epidemic?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Gaslight Effect.

Wikipedia

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 23:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Robin Stern's book The Gaslight Effect (2007) describes gaslighting as an epidemic?
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)

Reviewed: George Lauder (surgeon)

Created by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 13:25, 3 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Comment (not a review). Of the 10 sources in the article, only one (the J. Psychohistory review) appears to be both in-depth and directly about the book. Perhaps because of this, it has been tagged for notability, neutrality, and additional citations. These issues should be addressed (not merely hidden by removing the cleanup banners) before this can be DYK. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @David Eppstein:... Will go through. Whispyhistory (talk) 04:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment just to make your reviewer's life easier, @Whispyhistory—how did you address Eppstein's comment? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 03:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure....There are at least 3 in-depth analyses of the book....In 2019 it was analysed by psychohistorian Ken Fuchsman in "Gaslighting" published in The Journal of Psychohistory,[1] in sociologist Paige L. Sweet's article "The Sociology of Gaslighting" in the American Sociological Review,[2] and in professor of philosophy Cynthia A. Stark's paper "Gaslighting, Misogyny, and Psychological Oppression" in The Monist.[3]. Hope that's ok. I found a bachelors/masters and PhD based on the book too. Whispyhistory (talk) 04:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at this afresh, the article is new enough and long enough and the above issues seem to have been addressed. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Slightly modified ALT0 to T:DYK/P7