Talk:The Frying Game/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: That Ole Cheesy Dude ^{(Talk to the hand!)} 10:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Review will be coming very shortly. Thanks That Ole Cheesy Dude ^{(Talk to the hand!)} 10:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

• In Production, the whole start to the second paragraph is unreferenced, please ref it up.

Not at all! It's just that all that text uses the same ref, (ref 1) so reffing each sentence or whatever would be rather redundant.

• That's the only thing I could find in the entire article that could be faulted, this is fantastic work.

Thanks! :D

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   As I've said, I couldn't find one single spelling error or poorly structured sentence... and that's my specialty.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): (citations to reliable sources): (OR):

   Perfic'.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): (focused):

   Perfic'

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Perfic'.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Perfic'.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

That was the best Good Article Nom I've ever reviewed. Good job to the nominator!! Just one tiny thing to do and it's through.

That Ole Cheesy Dude ^{(Talk to the hand!)} 10:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Wow, thanks! And thanks for the review! I think it's pretty much good to go, unless you have found some other concern? :) Queenieacoustic (talk)

Wonderful stuff! That Ole Cheesy Dude ^{(Talk to the hand!)} 20:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)