Talk:The Princess and the Frog

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Princess and the Frog article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

view · edit

Frequently asked questions

To view an explanation to the answer, click the [show] link to the right of the question.

Q1: Should material that theorizes Disney's criticality of racial bias, be it based on religion, personal beliefs, etc., be in the article? (No.)

A1: No. Material critical of racial bias should not be included in the article unless it can be obtained from a viable source(s). The articles on Wikipedia include information from all significant points of view that relate to a common "neutral" point of view. This is summarized in the policy pages which can be accessed from the Neutral point of view policy. This article strives to conform to Wikipedia policies, which dictate that fringe areas be avoided whenever possible in contrast to mainstream views of those topics, or is this case, the film itself.

Q2: Should another article called Controversies of The Princess and the Frog be created? (No.)

A2: No. Another article called Controversies of The Princess and the Frog should not be created. This is called a "POV fork" and is discouraged.

Q3: Should proof that Disney is trying to support racial integration or racial segregation through this film be included in the article? (Most likely, No.)

A3: Most likely, No. Alleged proof that Disney is supporting racial intergration or racial segregation through this film should not be included in the article. That is because no such proof has come from reliable sources. If you have found a reliable source, such as a film industry source or an actual source from Disney themselves for example, that you think should be included, you can propose it for inclusion on the article’s talk page. We will evaluate each and report them according to their prominence. Note also that it is not the job of Wikipedia to convince those people who do believe this film was made with racial bias otherwise. We as editors represent and focus solely on the incontrovertible truth.

The Princess and the Frog received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article was nominated for deletion on November 29 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Animation: American / Films High‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as High-importance).

Disney High‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Animation / Cinema / Louisiana / New Orleans Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana - New Orleans (assessed as Low-importance).

Semi-protected edit request on 5 February 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Chance “Prince of Maldovia” to “Prince of Maldonia.” 47.151.53.61 (talk) 03:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done small jars tc 09:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Include the film's composer Randy Newman in the Voice Cast section, as he has a brief cameo appearance as Ray's "Cousin Randy". 2001:1970:4F65:C700:B0C1:AD04:B600:A5EE (talk) 18:59, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Historical negationism

"The film also received criticism for historical negationism of the Jim Crow era in the Southern USA."

It is obscene that this sentence has THREE citations but includes no quotes. Feels like original Editor is trying to sweep the issue under the rug. 2600:1702:8A0:8980:F00F:9561:F569:D9E8 (talk) 14:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, I wouldn't mind expanding that sentence (and there are probably other sources which discuss that too), but my guess is that they didn't want to give any of those citations undue weight. Historyday01 (talk) 21:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All reasoning aside a single sentence doesn't cut it. 2600:1702:8A0:8980:F00F:9561:F569:D9E8 (talk) 15:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can agree with that. Historyday01 (talk) 20:12, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]