Talk:The Freudian Coverup
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Freudian Coverup article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 years  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. |
POV section
[edit]I've added a POV section tag to the Background section here, because it doesn't make clear where it is reporting widely held, uncontroversial, positions, and where it is reporting more specifically Rush's views as she puts them forward in "The Freudian Coverup". The section also seems rather misnamed, as it is as much or more a summary of the article, rather than background to it. Perhaps it could be improved by beginning with uncontroversial facts about Freud's seduction theory, then including more controversial assertions that should be sourced to specifical people other than Rush, and finally describing what Rush's specific contribution was. A section called "Background" could also include more information about what the reception of Freud was at the time Rush wrote the article.VoluntarySlave (talk) 18:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)