Talk:The Forest House

Novels: Fantasy Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

King Arthur Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject King Arthur, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of King Arthur, the Arthurian era and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.King ArthurWikipedia:WikiProject King ArthurTemplate:WikiProject King ArthurKing Arthur articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tense markers

The article states that Zimmer Bradley "writes". Besides the fact that Zimmer Bradley is not the narrator of the book (in this case, no one is), she is also dead. Thus, I'm thinking "she writes" should be "she wrote". I've never seen the present tense used for the action of an author's writing in the case of novels; if you disagree, feel free to revert the change but be sure to leave your reasoning here. Esper ^rant 04:09, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Related works

You could also make the argument that the fall of atlantis (a collection of three books)and firebrand are related either thematically or maybe even directly to the avalon series. Reincarnation and past lives are a common theme in her books often with a priestess or priest with forbidden or troublesome love. There is also usually, a close relative(sister, mother, cousin)who makes life more difficult. Also, a feminist perspective.

Agree that The Forest House is related to The Fall of Atlantis -- one plot element in particular points to that. However, a couple corrections: "Fall" was previously published as two, not three, novels. And The Firebrand is not related at all, being a retelling of the Trojan War, and not having (as far as I can recall) any reference whatsoever to Arthurian legend. Finally, the direct sequel to this novel is Lady of Avalon Kltk78 (talk) 15:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The forest house book cover.jpg

Image:The forest house book cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crediting Diana L. Paxson's contribution to The Forest House

In Sword and Sorceress XI MZB writes in her introduction for Diana L. Paxson's Spirit Singer

... If you haven't read Diana's other books, look them up in Books in Print: They're good.

So good in fact, that when I decided to write the story mentioned at the end of Mists of Avalon—about Roman Britain and the Druid priestess Eilan—it was Diana I chose to collaborate with me on it. Because of marketing decisions, Viking decided my name alone would sell better—I'm not sure why—but here among friends, so to speak, I'm happy to acknowledge Diana's help and input. It should be out in April 1994; look for The Forest House.

Is this secondary contributor credit noteworthy enough for mention in this article? I see that Paxson's article already lists her as "(uncredited)" for The Forest House. --Marc Kupper|talk 04:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added info & quote --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 08:04, 29 November 2018 (UTC) Done[reply]

Characters Development

Why in the article it is said that the characters are less developed than in Mist of Avalon? This is Personal Opinion and shouldn't be in here!187.14.134.54 (talk) 23:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are quite a few statements in the article unsupported by references. I have added one "cite needed" tag, to stand for all. --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 08:07, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]