Talk:The Flyting of Dunbar and Kennedie

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Start‑class Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Language issues

I find it incredible that the article can totally ignore the interesting language issues in the poem, a Lothian "Inglis" speaker vs a Carrick (Lowland) "Erisch" speaker.--MacRusgail (talk) 18:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See the page on Walter Kennedy which begins to touch on this, though I agree, more needs done. strangtea (talk) 22:55, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Date?

Can we please include the date(s) / period in the intro. Otherwise hard to put in context. --Mais oui! (talk) 13:16, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Morgan 23:14, 8 November 2016 (UTC) I agree. A dating of the work, even an approximation. Is an important missing element in the article, since there are two references of importance In the article itself. They include the first paragraph, which refers to the work as one of the earliest examples (so, prove this key statement). And later, in the INFLUENCE section, where the claim is made of its effect on the subsequent "two centuries." Which two centuries? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElectraShore (talk • contribs)