Talk:The Firefly (Fringe)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. I'll give it a read through now and add any points that arise below. Miyagawa (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Ratings: "and with 7 days after airing, reported a total of 6.7 million viewers with 2.8 rating" - somehow doesn't sound quite right, I'm thinking that "and within 7 days after airing, it reported a total..." might be better.

And that is quite literally the only issue I have with this nomination. Placing this one on hold until rectified, which I'm sure won't take too long. Good job! Miyagawa (talk) 00:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Fixed!. Please let me know if the article needs anything else. Thanks! Ruby2010 talk 00:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

All good, happy to grade this one as a GA! Miyagawa (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC)