Talk:The Fate of Fausto

The Fate of Fausto has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 5, 2021. (Reviewed version).

A fact from The Fate of Fausto appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 2019 children's picture book The Fate of Fausto was inspired by the German legend of Faust, who trades his soul in exchange for unlimited knowledge and worldly pleasures?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Fate of Fausto.

Wikipedia

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Fate of Fausto/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CommanderWaterford (talk · contribs) 22:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Broad Coverage: The Plot Summary seem to be somewhat "thin", not having read the book - is it possible to expand it somewhat? CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: ✓ Pass

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: ✓ Pass
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: ✓ Pass

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: ✓ Pass

C. It contains no original research: ✓ Pass

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: ✓ Pass
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: ✓ Pass

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): ✓ Pass
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: ✓ Pass
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: ✓ Pass
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: ✓ Pass

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: ✓ Pass
Overall:
Pass or Fail: ✓ Pass

CommanderWaterford, I've expanded the plot. Please let me know if it looks alright. Ashley yoursmile! 05:34, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.